re: #259 freetoken

I’m just working off the basic premise that any document whose provenance is in question immediately becomes useless to any proponent of such a document, in front of an impartial jury.

The memo’s provenance is in question, yet Gleick sent it out, so there’s no difference either way.

I’m also quite open to the idea of a third party being involved, say someone who had it in for Gleick and perhaps knew him well enough to know how to trap him.

That third party would have to have access to the high-level HI documents then. Sounds like more epicycles to me.