re: #259 Bubblehead II

From what I have picked up in the comment section it was (possibly) a termination of parental rights hearing. Something all the involved parties had no objection to and should have been a routine matter right up to the point the Judge let his bigotry get in the way. Oh, the commenters also seem to believe this is the study he used to base his decision on.

A “reality check” for the Regnerus study on gay parenting [UPDATED]

Wasn’t the Regnerus study the one where there was blatant cherrypicking of data and almost everyone who was cited as sources said that he misrepresented their statements and demanded that they be removed?