re: #249 Charles

Which is what this climate scientist is saying, including posting her statement on ClimateAudit: dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com

You cannot massage the data to meet your desired outcome, no more than you can refuse to believe your indications because they don’t fit the casuality. (TMI: rising pressurizer level can mean that reactor fill is working, but it can also mean that there is a steam bubble in the core.)