re: #249 researchok

I can agree that you may find his ideas objectionable- there are things he says I don’t agree with either. But to say, “he’s an extremist who should not be given any credibility” is absurd. I can think of ‘extremists’ on the other side who are far more egregious offenders than Horowitz!

It’s one thing to argue Horowitz ideas. It’s a whole other thing to say his facts are wrong when in fact they just don’t like his conclusions.

As I said, very little of his work can be deemed not credible.

Wrong facts are wrong facts. Only through the unfair toss of a coin will those wrong facts lead to a correct conclusion.

From what I can see Horowitz isn’t on speaking terms with facts, but he is good at polemics.