We need to reduce our carbon emissions to keep from destroying our environment. Some people will always remain skeptics, but most people will be swayed if they’re shown evidence that convinces them the problem is both real and significant, and that the solutions are legitimate and effective. Virtually nobody will be convinced by Pascal’s Wager, because it’s a weak argument. Therefore, we should stick to solid evidence (as in other threads) instead of Pascal’s Wager.

(Pithy enough rewrite of #92?)