re: #220 EPR-radar

Be fair. Multiple choice Mitt embraced all sides of every issue. As a matter of logic, he must have been telling the truth about 50% of the time, which is pretty good, all things considered.

I’m going to use only one example of not being truthful. Did Mitt use an edit to be deceptive. No. But saying to a select group of people that 47% of everyone you, I and Dark knows are shiftless entitlement takers is in the damn ballpark. And to say it in a room of your supporters is it’s own edit. Once it came out he said it, he self edited that comment and ran away from owning it.

Hell, he said it was out of context and not what he meant, but never could get around to explaining what he did mean. Everyone knew. Talk about editing. Just not on film. But straight from the horses mouth…denial. But message sent.

Just like 47% can be a metaphor (as Grayson was attempting with the KKK) it also can be debated that is actually what Romney thinks of America (as it can be debated the Tea Party has some racism inherent - Grayson). Half of us are takers. Talk about disregard for a whole group of people. I’ll give him (Romney) credit that he was able to lump all kinds of races and groups in his dismissing. And not an ounce of truth in that BS. Matter of fact. I bet Romney’s comment goes down in history. How far is Grayson’s email crap gonna last?

And that is all I am going to discuss about it, unless someone wants to discuss it!