re: #270 albusteve

we don’t profile…and if we did it would be subjective…what’s with screening passengers?…that has nothing to to with anything besides weapons…they can’t bust you for being angry, or depressed, or fatigued…you are really just making shit up now…what changing policies are you even talking about?…regarding what?

Say the shooter was compelled to have regular therapy as part of his position. (Maybe he did, we’ll assume he did not). That would be a policy. That might have caught his intent before he picked up a weapon.

I’m not making anything up, I’m opining about how learning more about his motives and psychology could be a helpful thing. Don’t you think it may have been easier to spot what he was about to do if he was seeing a shrink himself weekly?

This isn’t even a controversial stand, why does it bother you? We studied Ted Bundy’s case to try and figure out why he did what he did. Should we not have done that? Should we just have said “yep, Bundy’s a murderer, fuck it, don’t need to know any more!”