re: #10 lawhawk

There’s no but in the 1st Amendment. You can’t say on the one hand that you are for the 1st Amendment and on the other say that it is inapplicable because it would be insensitive to others. That goes against the very spirit of the 1st.

This is a flawed argument.

As usual, the “buts” in the Constitution are written in invisible ink, discernible only to the likes of Sarah Palin and Bobby Spencer.

Why, if you do a black-light examination of that document, or just hold it up to a candle (careful! wouldn’t want to burn the thing!), the words “Jesus Christ, King of Kings and Lord of Lords, is my personal savior with whom I have long conversations over pints of pale ale” are visible throughout.