re: #269 Guanxi88

re: #256 Obdicut

That’s seditious talk, my friend. Incitement, perhaps not, but certainly subversive of the rule of law and ordered liberty.

What are you, one of those wild-eyed mob?

Accusing me of treason isn’t funny.

You said you defer to the Supreme Court’s argument. I defer to the Supreme Court’s ruling in that it is the law of the land, but not that it settles the argument once and forever. I don’t agree with them on this ruling, or on Kelo.

Do you understand that one can accept that the Supreme Court has ruled a certain way, meaning that is the law, but still agree with the dissenters on the court that the ruling was in error? How is that not a reasonable position? How does that lead to you accusing me of sedition?