re: #286 Justanotherhuman

Here’s a pretty good story on it: blogs.ocweekly.com

It does not, however mention that she’s arguing the case pro se, although it does allege she “shopped the case” to this particular judge.

“Shopping Taitz v. Johnson—as in Jeh Johnson, the Department of Homeland Security secretary, although Obama, Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell and the U.S. Border Patrol, Rio Grande Valley Sector, are also named as defendants—to Hanen would be unethical at best and illegal at worst.” More

Notice that she is the plaintiff in the case, so she is, in fact, representing herself, even if the article does not describe it as such. It’s a nice little technicality that lets her “practice law” in any jurisdiction she desires, by claiming herself as the aggrieved party.