re: #287 Mike Lamb

I actually think the work around on that issue would be pretty easy. If the gun/accessory artificially allowed a firearm, regardless of user, to achieve a certain rate of fire, it’s no good. If a person can fire x number of bullets per minute without any mechanical assistance, good for them.

But we live in an insane society, because there is literally no legitimate, functional reason for a bump stock to exist, other than mass murder/destruction.

Especially when people argue there’s no difference between a bump stock and a belt loop.