I read the piece and this thread and there’s one thing I wanted to note that wasn’t mentioned. Maybe it can help explain why the author and his client are so out of step with the conclusions of the investigation:

The investigators have access to the unredacted reports and likely know a lot more about what actually happened (or the explanation of what happened) than these peripheral witnesses. This would make Holder’s office look complicit, when they were really doing a good job addressing and investigating the complaint.

Seems likely the commander REALLY messed up in the handling of something though, since he’s now a ROTC instructor.

This appears to me to be one of those things that the full 40 years is going to have to pass before we see the full reports.