re: #293 Spare O’Lake

Right, and if all the nuts and bolts are agreed then what does it matter if you call it marriage or something else? That would be a very nice compromise if it was acceptable to gays and heteros.

Ah. Now we make sense. Spare’s idea of ‘compromise’ is to extend state and federal benefits of marriage to same-sex couples, but not call it marriage. Sure. You run with that.

One note: you presume the compromise here is between gays and heteros. It is not.