re: #299 Naso Tang

Of course I agree, but my point is that you suggested he is fundamentally anti religious. I don’t know that.

My reaction is based on the implied recognition that non religious is anti religious; but I don’t mean that is necessarily your view. Perhaps I am being pedantic.

No, I can see where you got that. Context was clearer in my mind than it came out.

I just meant that the far right would howl that he wasn’t “conservative enough” since he’s on the wrong end of their pet issues.

Later lizardim, I’m off for my math mid-term.