re: #292 kirkspencer

What message am I to take? Were you digressing off the point, and so I should simply have ignored you? Or was the point that this movement isn’t as important - to which assumption I was objecting.

The point was that King, at that point, had faced silence from the moderates in the face of mass beatings and murder. That is part of why he was so angry. That is the historical context of his speech.

How you got to me ‘belittling’ anything I have no fucking clue.

I was saying that if you’re going to use the words of King, remember why he said them. It wasn’t an academic inquiry.