re: #26 lawhawk

I actually think that he’s relieved that the Court will be doing what he couldn’t (and still be considered a GOP candidate). I’d rather he have taken a stand and said that he’d enact SSM rather than punt to a referendum. Instead, he’s going to let the court do it for him and let him use it to rail against activist judges, one of whom he’s picked and with 2 vacancies (because he and the legislature can’t agree on how to fill the slots).

But but but, I thought he was so good at being bipartisan and working across the aisle!

///