re: #304 dangerman

i want to make an ot observation about the emerging issue with the clinton foundation

my question: in 1997 should the clintons have not set up the foundation which inarguably has saved a large number of lives and made countless other lives significantly better?

i’m not going to lay out the whole logic because i think its patent.
and personally i dont think there will ever be proof of pay to play because it didnt happen. of course theres access. its national and international politics. how naive….

emailgate came out of benghazi and now the server was an “error” which at the time pretty much was common knowledge and no one cared
now its an error that shows poor judgment

speeches - someone hooked onto that, created a new standard. at the time pretty much was common knowledge and no one cared
now its an error that shows poor judgment

the foundation was established in 1997. at the time pretty much was common knowledge and no one cared
now its an error or some kind of new scandal or i dont know what

these -gates are all retro, post hoc ginned up issues that no one could foresee specifically
unless the clintons never left home and did nothing - and of course that would be a different scandal

and if it wasnt this one or the other one or the third, it would be whatever was available that someone could use to create whatever cloud they wanted

Pretty good summary. And guess who is responsible for so much of it coming off the way it does?

Our glorious media.

Yet idiots like Chucky Todd complain it all smells rotten. And he does nothing to improve the smell…he adds to it and stands back and says…Wow, sure does smell.