re: #32 lawhawk

What better way to impugn the OWS movement than to claim that someone attacked the WH and was involved in OWS - even though all evidence (you know - what lawyers and law enforcement look for) points to the contrary.

This is like throwing the proverbial “everything and the kitchen sink” to attack the OWS movement.

And it’s completely bogus.

The best they can do is make crap up. Telling, very telling about the critics.