re: #329 Daniel Ballard

My argument uses demographics as merely one example among the totality of circumstances states have.

I don’t see where. You said “Population, demographics, income all make a substantial difference. ” Population and income are subsets of ‘demographics’.

Can you explain why doing things at a state level in Montana with 400,000 people is right, doing things in California with 39 million is right, but doing things in New York City with 8 mlllion people wouldn’t be right?