Comment
Comment
re: #328 RogueOne
You’re starting to confuse me. The argument you posted the link to contained a debate about the costs/benefits of spending to “battle” AGW. That isn’t an argument about science, it’s an argument about economics.
Dear lord, Rogue, what is up with you?
The stated position that AGW may not be as important as natural factors is AGW denial. It is also a nonsensical statement, since what AGW is is the theory that anthropogenic factors are accelerating natural processes.
In addition the association with the Koch’s with the Cato institute and the American Prosperity people and their associated AGW denial is pretty hard to miss.
