re: #26 Charles

I’m not attacking the lawyer - I’m attacking his rationalization for choosing to defend DOMA.

This case is different from a criminal case where even the lowest POS must and should have representation. Clement is defending an unjust law, not a person. And his rationalization is crap.

Yes his rationalization is crap, and yes it’s not a criminal case where there is someone who has a right to be represented. I still feel though that a win by default on these cases is not a good thing. It makes for bad law.