re: #348 SixDegrees

Not in anything approaching a sufficient way. You responded that you’re attacking them because they destroyed data— which it does not appear actually happened. You’re pushing a direct line of anti-science propaganda without apparent regard for the truth of it.

And when asked why you’re using it to attack scientists and not those abusing science to discredit AGW, your response is simply to repeat the attack on the scientists.

I do not find that a compelling argument in the least.