re: #343 Walter L. Newton

Walter, way to ignore the points I posted. Let me repeat if you have somehow found in the last few days, all the code that was hacked from CRU, because you were complimenting six on it yesterday or the day before, in in that day of your intense and brilliant analysis of the code, you fell you have a serious question, then make it. I do not have their code in front of me, and more over for all the reasons I listed and you ignored, it would be a stupid enterprise anyway.

I don’t care if you are the original computer nerd who dreams in machine language and writes poetry in hexadecimal. It does not mean you know the first thing about the science.

I repeat. Their science and their data was published many times in peer reviewed journals along the way. People with actual PhD.s looked at it and did not see glaring nonsense errors.

I care, I really don’t care about what you think about their coding skills particularly if you only have some piece of their code taken from a hack that was designed to disscredit them.

Do you have any idea how much that makes you and six into assholes for even looking at it, let alone trying to debate about it?

Six you want evidence of being a denier you little shiot, ok how about you took criminally gathered partial evidence at face value, to critique honest hardworking scientists and convinced your little sheep Walter to bleat after you?