re: #354 lawhawk
Except that he wasn’t. He was a convicted felon. Shot and killed his son in a hunting accident. Had a gun charge. So, no. He wasn’t.
Except that he wasn’t. He was a convicted felon. Shot and killed his son in a hunting accident. Had a gun charge.
So, no. He wasn’t.
He was a legal irresponsible gun owner. Isn’t there something wrong with that?