re: #35 pittee

Says you.

See, this is not actually an effective argument. You stated that if there was a study that showed something I disagreed with, I’d find a way to get around this. This is not true, you’ve acknowledged it is not true, you’ve said it isn’t even true for yourself, so your statement is really reduced to the absolutely trivial “you haven’t been convinced of things you haven’t been convinced of”. Your actual claim is still invalidated, by your own statement.

It could be said to be something I am holding onto, sure, it is an opinion I have wound up with and it is a belief I have wound up with, and I cannot prove alot of what I have said. I am ok with what I said and how I said it.

Okay. Given the number of times you’ve made claims that you had to immediately go back on, I think that you do seem to be arguing from an emotional position rather than an actual reasonable one, and I invite you to read up on EST from critical sources to get a better understanding than you currently have.

I don’t think the arguments you’ve made here would convince anyone who wasn’t invested in EST being true.