re: #23 blueraven
>[Embedded content] My guess, or rather my hope, is this is the hospital hoping to set judicial precedent that when the hospital rules that a fetus is not viable, then they’re not legally required to continue “life-saving care.”
>[Embedded content]
My guess, or rather my hope, is this is the hospital hoping to set judicial precedent that when the hospital rules that a fetus is not viable, then they’re not legally required to continue “life-saving care.”