re: #363 Walter L. Newton

Ludwig, I am composing a narrative for Jaerik, who seems interested in the data. Stick around and you can jump in if you want. Otherwise, I’m not interested in your comments right now, I tried to engage you in this conversation a little while ago, you refused, I’m busy.

NO because your narrative is questionable from the start.

There is no way to consider it, without the code and the complete code in question.

Now the best case scenario is you got your hands on a piece of someone’s private and stolen work, which you are now analyzing in the way that those who released that piece would like you to look at it. And you know what, even if it is fully legit - in the sense that the code is the actual stolen code. You still will not be able to prove anything.

why?

Because the science of the papers it was published in is kosher. The review was kosher.

Even Six was smart enough to drop this nonsense yeterday when he got called on it. You however were always too pig headed to see when yuo have a completely losing hand. This is just like when you believed Jonah Goldberg Walter. You should learn from your past mistakes.