re: #366 Guanxi88

Nor would that be what the law would say. you’re over-simplifying the case to a remarkable degree. There are prohibitions against the taking of life, and yet the law recognizes occasions where it is excusable, permissible, and even mandatory to do so. This does not mean that the law is self-contradictory, or that the law demands the taking of life.

I’m not oversimplifying; I”m merely discussing this in the narrow context that is the Free Exercise Clause. I am not arguing that the law cannot be nuanced; I am arguing that the law cannot be nuanced for or against a particular religious group.