re: #31 prononymous

REGARDING: It doesn’t address the truth/untruth of the statements he has made.

RESPONSE: That is a very sagacious observation.

It would be logical to attack a message, not the messenger, i.e., one should review a message and those comments, with which one believes to be incorrect or misleading, should be addressed with rational reasons.

NOTE: The purpose of my original posting was to present a relationship between union and non-union workers/consumers/taxpayers.
It was to present a framework of pragmatic reality to be used to understand and, secondarily, to elicit a discussion which might improve this “white paper” effort.