re: #371 lawhawk

They’re trying to compare what they do to civil disobedience, which is kind of silly. Civil disobedience generally involves not complying with a restrictive law about speech or assembly— not attempting to shut the speech of others down.

I used to think Barrett was kooky but quite smart and principled. Now he hangs out with people who support genocide, simply because Charles banned him. Consistency, not exactly his strong suit.