re: #372 lawhawk

Something does seem off about that whole story though. Does she really go through staff, and have issues or is this another case of screwing over women who seek to be president?

This is also from the story:

What is indisputable, however, is that Klobuchar’s office consistently has one of the highest rates of staff turnover in the Senate. Klobuchar’s rate of turnover ranked No. 1 in an analysis of all Senate staff salaries between 2001 and 2016, conducted by LegiStorm, a widely used database of congressional staff salaries. (Klobuchar was sworn into office in 2007.) She’s now third, behind Maryland Democrat Chris Van Hollen and Louisiana Republican John Kennedy.

And this is not the first time Klobuchar has had issues building a team because of worries about her mistreatment of staff.

A former employee in her Senate office recalled her struggling to find an outside candidate to replace an outgoing chief of staff. A staffer in another Hill office recounted losing interest in a job opening with Klobuchar when a current staffer, the one conducting the interview, conveyed that avoiding Klobuchar’s anger was a significant part of the job.

I’ve worked for plenty of bad bosses, male and female, over the years. Including places that had high turnover. It makes it a lot harder to do a good job. So, yeah, as Belafon said, if it’s true, she probably wouldn’t make a good president.