re: #381 Charles

Yes, Roy Spencer IS a creationist — not “supposedly.” And if you prefer to get your scientific “knowledge” from creationists, your opinions will be treated with exactly the respect they deserve, i.e., none.

I’m not disagreeing with the point that you hate a scientist for being a creationist (that’s sound in my opinion), I’m disagreeing with the fact that you throw out all of his research. Are you suggesting that we discard and never reference the UAH satellite data of the past 30 years? If RSS data didn’t exist, you’d basically throw out the most precise temperature measurements we have because a creationist was credited with its genesis (no pun intended).