re: #389 Decatur Deb

That broke. Comment was that Cato Inst. and marijuana interest points me back to Libertarian candidacy. I don’t need more discredit than that.

So if i understand you correctly, David was a libertarian candidate and it’s on that basis, rather than any supposed (but to my knowledge unfounded) relationship with JBS, that you would disqualify any Cato publication before even having read it?

I don’t want to put words in your mouth, thus my attempt at clarification-