re: #378 ShaunP

Somehow, I feel like all roads in this argument lead to “the MET office is corrupted by politics and all of their science is questionable”…

Not from me, I welcome their raising their game and developing a Temp-set that is peer reviewable, open, robust, repeatable and able to be replicated and confirmed by indispensable researchers. With data sets that are documented, verifiable and accurate. The polar opposite of what the CRU produced.