re: #370 albusteve

is there some reason besides the law not too?…what’s your take?

My take, albeit somewhat “loony” to some, is this: if you’ve been caught in the act of violating the law—in this case the attempted murder of 300+ individuals in the air, as well as others on the ground—perhaps a small suspension in your “rights” isn’t out of line, nor to this individual, unexpected.

I don’t consider, in this specific case, the withholding of “Bag Balm” to be “morally repugnant” as was suggested by SixDegrees. I do, however, consider attempting to murder 300+ innocents to be incredibly “morally repugnant.”