Here’s what I think is the clincher. That he’s so quick to disassociate himself from Bain because “I left in 1999”. Yet at the same time he’s saying, but there’s nothing wrong with Bain. But he’s glad he left in 1999? Which is it? He’s trying to have it both ways.

“Yes, I realize that Bain did a lot of bad things but I was already gone from Bain. But still, even though they did bad things there’s no reason why I would not have been proud to have been with them at that time…”

Even thought the SEC docs say otherwise.