re: #38 Targetpractice

Eh, I’d hold off on that, apparently “Patriots20” and I were both thrown by the article having the wrong name. Apparently that is Ahmaud and he was arrested for having a .380 pistol.

This is where you have to reject the whole framing of the “argument”. Is he stating that anyone with an arrest record is outlaw and can be killed on sight? Because I’d bet a lot of those bubbas have seen the inside of the county lockup. It’s only those with a certain…quality.

ETA: To take this further, is he suggesting that anyone who has violated gun laws can be shot on sight?