re: #355 LudwigVanQuixote

And I’ll tell you what Sal, answer this and I won’t consider you quite as mathematically deficient… :)

Since people cannot have an infinite number of children, an upper limit of tries has to be set, so the pure equation doesn’t apply.

Show me why the fallacy of denying the antecedent is functionally equivalent to the fallacy of affirming the consequent, and I won’t consider you so logically deficient.