re: #42 lawhawk

Again, that goes to what the terms of the severance deal, and whether he later filed amended returns on those years. I don’t think he’s gone and committed perjury or other crimes relating to his being labeled CEO, managing partner, etc., on the SEC filings from 1999-2002.

I’m referring to the FEC declaration. If the tax returns show that he listed his occupation as CEO, Chairman, etc of Bain and never amended those returns then the FEC declaration is demonstrably false.

It’s the same reason neither he nor Bain will answer certain questions about his involvement during that time, such as whether he continued to be covered as an employee on Bain health insurance.