re: #425 SanFranciscoZionist

Oh boy. I really hope that was just a ham-handed way of explaining that the woman in the case died before it was resolved, but…yeah, not the best detail to throw in there.

What was she banking on, that a poor haredi homemaker wouldn’t read her novel, or have resources to pursue the issue if she realized her work had been ripped off?

What I don’t understand is why this author, obviously many steps above the poor downtrodden haredi woman she ripped off, would even bother to copy someone who is so far beneath her in literary accomplishments? Isn’t she supposed to have awesome talent on her very own?

Was it just a way to spit on the lowly haredi woman and say “fuck you! I can do whatever I want because I am Teh Awesome you are an untermensch.”

I thought Naomi Ragen is supposed to speak for oppressed women, not step all over them.