re: #457 jackflash

You promised your links would provide me that proof (the missing links?).

Well they do… but of course you would have to actually read them first.

Consider the links from the American Institute of Physics… This gives a complete discussion of how me measure the Carbon and how the history of the field evolved.

aip.org

Sort of the seminal paper or at least one of them that laid this all out was.

SCEP (Study of Critical Environmental Problems) (1970). Man’s Impact on the Global Environment. Assessment and Recommendation for Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. .

This too was in those links.

I invite all with questions in this area to review Lud’s submitted links in his note #451, repeated here:

[Link: www.aip.org…]
[Link: earthguide.ucsd.edu…]
[Link: www.gfdl.noaa.gov…]
[Link: earthguide.ucsd.edu…]

Please do look through these! PLease everyone actually read them. You will find the actual science!

These links give a good example of what I’ve been up against in my inquiry over the past 5 or 6 years.

What? The truth?

Good Grief! These are either articles or collections of articles, not papers. These are popular treatments designed for the layman,

No these are scientific links from actual people in the field designed to explain to the Layman - like you. Please don’t pretend that you know the science. Your ignorance has shown through in too many places.

and they specialize in broad statements with out a lot of detail.

Excuse me… You really didn’t look at the AIP links at all did you… Each of those articles as you put it is hyperlinked to essentially a history of the entire field.

Where are the regression analyses I asked for (and you promised me, Lud)??

And I actually happen to know what a regression analysis is. Do you? How does that apply in whatever case you are referring to? You see, you managed to fail a little test. Had you actually looked at one of the links posted, you would have found that really the only place where such language made sense to use was addressed.

Here is a more direct test to point out how you really are just fronting.

What exactly do you mean by a regression analysis… As applied to what data set? Be specific. I get very tired of frauds like you using big words that you do not understand.