re: #10 lawhawk

So, just because Andy Warhol decided to make pop art out of the leader of one of the most heinous regimes in history (whose body count is probably above 70 million), and some community group thinks it okay to use the Warhol pop-art as a Christmas ornament, it’s okay?

I think it speaks to Warhol’s warped sensibilities to turn Mao into “art”, followed by the idiocy of the community group that thought including Mao on their ornament was a good idea (even if it was Warhol’s print).

Ah, another enemy of art. Another cultureless nitwit smearing an incredibly important artist for his choice of subject matter.

Methinks the same vacant, vacuous nimrods who wanted to slam the Obamas for their choice of art before are going to come out of the woodwork once again.

I don’t pontificate on how airplane engines work or the intricacies of World War I. Because I wouldn’t know what I was talking about. Just like you don’t know what you’re talking about now.