re: #43 Rightwingconspirator

Until one considers scientific proof is far better suited to matters of science than faith. Hence the distinct term. If one accepts the absence of evidence as evidence for absence, I’m not sure that’s solid logic. Human culture enjoys many aspects that science has no bearing on.

You can spin it any way you want… what ever makes you feel good… I don’t care… in my little world… a belief in god is not much different than a belief in a god who want you to behead a non-believer.

They all float down there.