re: #476 Bagua

Yes, and when I said, “As a scientist I will give we are 90% certain that we are the only driver worth being taken into account” it means that I will give a 10% chance that something else may be posing a small enough effect that we need to account for it as well as the primary driver.

I said that we are 100% certain that modern human activities are the primary driver of the present cycle.

I gave the reasons why this is certain.

You acknowledged that those reasons are true.

If they are true, you must conclude with certainty that we are the primary driver.

Yet you would rather obfuscate and insult.

Your game is up Bagua, others are noticing that you are full of shit too.

Of course, you could have avoided that by talking science and actually debating science like you claim to want to. However you called the facts strawmen and continued with your crap.

It makes you a troll, and a silly one at that.

I stand by everything I have said about your pathetic misuse of the word science, and your foolish attempts to sound “scientific.” I can only conclude that you are playing an obnoxious game for reasons of ego. It’s an asshole move. The insults made it so, and don’t whine about how reasonable you are. You know full well you were picking a fight. You also know full well you lost.