re: #485 HappyWarrior

The two RW talking points to me seem to be HEARSAY and the debunked bs that the whisteblower law was recently changed. Watch out for both of those in social media or in interactions with wingnut family, friends, neighbors, coworkers, etc.

RWNJs have always been stupid and deceitful about confusing trial and investigative standards. “Hearsay” is usually inadmissable in trial testimony but a perfectly valid basis for initiating an investigation. Similarly, I routinely see wingnuts whinge about presumption of innocence being violated when a GOP fatcat or pedophile preacher is arrested, as though conviction in a court of law is necessary BEFORE the defendant is arrested.