re: #491 kirkspencer

“is quite possible” is… I’m not certain.

You’re not certain about what, exactly? That it is possible that it is a fake? It is impossible that it is a fake? Can you defend this statement?

The claim regarding what’s fake has changed several times.

Not to my knowledge. Can you elaborate?

It does not help their position that Heartland has lied in the past about what they were doing.

Nor does not hinder the possibility of fakery.

If it is fake, I agree it should not be used. At this point, however, I think Heartland must show, not just claim, it to be fake before the use is ended.

Quite the opposite, the burden of proof is always on the presenter of the leaks.