re: #2 Obdicut

I need a little while to absorb this. Is the upshot of this that a domestic terrorist attack in the US can be tied to Kissinger’s policies?

That’s what it seems to say.

Not terrorism. This was an attack aimed at the killing of a specific person. It seems to me an overreaction by the Pinochet regime. I understand why they wanted that lousy socialist ass out of Chile, but why did they want to kill him after he was gone?