re: #50 Gus

A) This is practically a one in a million case.
B) The state probably already spent more money opposing it.
C) Initial approval would have been the most cost effective.
D) The SRS remains the most cost effective in consideration of future security mitigation of a prisoner with GID.
E) SRS should be covered by insurance.

In that case:

A. Prisons should not start anyone on hormone therapy for this issue.
B. They should oppose it as much as possible
C. People paying for this them self would have been the most cost effective.
D. That is your extremely personal opinion
E. SRS should not be covered by insurance

Can we be done now? Am I allowed to have my opinion?