re: #51 EiMitch

Why do you insist that the popular definitions of God include a requirement that its interventions be indistinguishable from natural phenomenon?

This doesn’t seem consistent with what little I know of religious teachings. For example, Catholicism requires documented miracles as part of the process for naming someone a saint.

Furthermore, that requirement makes your claim that god is intrinsically unknowable true by definition, which suggests circular reasoning.