re: #524 recusancy

#104

Sometimes there are people who are evil. Putting them into art just isn’t right no matter how you look at it. Hitler was evil. So was Stalin and Mao. I just don’t think it was appropriate. The blood on their hands is the blood of tens of millions each.
I just don’t think it warrants being immortalized as art.

It’s “not right” to make art about important people or important acts? The blood of millions of people on his hands is the perfect reason to make art of his image. He’s already immortalized. Warhol depicted him. There’s no “wrong or right” about it. It’s an image.